Organisation Chart | State Tax Department Uttar Pradesh
Visitors-
fb fb
Skip to main content
Menu

सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा पारित निर्णय - Recent Judicial Pronouncements

Central Search

SNo.SLP NoYearAppellant NameSectionSubject/TopicSub Subject/TopicRemarkJudgement DateView Details
1 105022025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2, DC SIB(RANGE B) GAUTAMBUDHNAGARSECTION 130 READ WITHONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE AND NOT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION 130 O  15/04/2025Select
2 105012025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2, (APPEAL), DC SIB RANGE A KANPURSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE AND NOT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION 130 O  15/04/2025Select
3 105032025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2, (APPEAL), AC SIB KANPUR RANGE BSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE AND NOT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION 130 O  15/04/2025Select
4 96522025STATE OF U.P., COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2(APPEAL), DC SIB RANGE A, BSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE IN CASE OF THE EXCESS STOCK FOUND DURING S  04/04/2025Select
5 96452025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, DC SIB RANGE A SAHARANPURSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE IN CASE OF THE EXCESS STOCK FOUND DURING S  04/04/2025Select
6 108362025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, (APPEAL), AC SIB ETAWAHSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE IN CASE OF THE EXCESS STOCK FOUND DURING S  17/04/2025Select
7 248442025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, DC SIB RANGE D KANPURSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE IN CASE OF THE EXCESS STOCK FOUND DURING S  01/09/2025Select
8 179952022M/S ASP TRADERSSECTION 129(3) OF UPHONORABLE SUPREME COURT IN ITS ORDER DATED 24-07-2025 MENTIONED, “ACCORDINGLY, THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT IS SET ASIDE. RESPONDENT NO  24/07/2025Select
9 00146120251 THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 2 ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2 APPEAL ETAWAH 3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONSECTION 129(3)FOLLOWING THE ORDER DATED 05.08.2024 PASSED IN SLP(C) NO.16608/2024 [STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. VS. M/S NEW KANHAIYA LAL LALJI], WE DISMISS THIS SPECIAL L  16/01/2025Select
10 01051120251 STATE OF U.P 2 COMMISSIONER OF STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX UP 3 THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, GRADESECTION 129(3)RELATED TO E WAY BILL  15/04/2025Select
11 01758020251 STATE OF U.P. 2 THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2 APPEAL (IV) KANPUR 3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MOSECTION 129(3)RELATED TO E WAY BILL  07/07/2025Select
12 0227672025APPELLANT 1 KPS IRON AND ALLOYS COMPANY PVT. LTD. RESPONDENT(S):1 STATE OF U.P. 2 COMMISSIONERS OF SECTION 74(9) OF UPSREGARDING VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE  13/08/2025Select
13 DIARY NO. 44104/20252025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, GRADE -02 (APPEAL)-V, STATE TAX KANPUR, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SECTOR 2 (MSECTION 129E WAY BILL  08/09/2025Select
14 SLP (C)NO.025330/20252025M/S VARUN ENTERPRISES VERSUS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE 2 APPEAL SECOND STATE TAX BAREILLY & ORS.SECTION 127, READ WIDISCREPANCIES RELATED TO TAX INVOICE  04/09/2025Select
15 20238-402025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, AC SIB, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, AC SIB , KANPUR RANGE CSECTION 130 R/W SEC HONBLE HIGH COURT OPINED THAT THE PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION73/74 OF UPGST ACT SHOULD BE PRESSED IN SERVICE IN CASE OF THE EXCESS STOCK FOUND DURING S  25/07/2025Select
16 00693320251 STATE OF U.P. 2 ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, GR 2(APPEAL)- 1ST STATE TAX, GORAKHPUR 3 ASSISTANT COMMISSECTION 129(3)HONORABLE SUPREME COURT PRONOUNCED “WE ARE NOT INCLINED TO INTERFERE IN THE MATTER. THE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS HENCE DISMISSED. WE ALSO NOTE THAT S  07/03/2025Select
17 01660820241 STATE OF U.P. 2 ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER-GRADE II APPEAL-ETAWAH 3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MOBILE SQU129(3) UPGST ACTRELATED TO E WAY BILL  05/08/2024Select
18 265012025ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GRADE-2, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (SIB) KANPUR-D VS M/S DEE CONTROL AND ELECTRI130 GSTEXCESS STOCK FOUND AT BUSINESS PLACESIBHon. Sup. Court did not find any merit in this petition. The same is accordingly disposed of.15/09/2025Select
19 0183952025M/S SARSWAT PEROXIDES PRIVATE LIMITED VS THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, U.PSECTION 28(2)WHETHER THE SUPPLIED COMMODITY IS FOOD SUPPLEMENT OR CHEMICALAdjudicationHon. Supreme Court find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.15/07/2025Select
20 15302015M/S NEHA ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX, LUCKNOW, UPVAT SECTION 13(1) / DISCLAIM OF ITCITCThe Civil Appeal fails, and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.09/04/2025Select
12